
Extracts from Peter Dauvergne’s Environmentalism of the Rich (Part 3)
I
would encourage you not to disregard Peter Dauvergne’s
‘Environmentalism of the Rich’ offhand
based on the title. I will admit, the title does sound quite
antagonistic, even to me (I probably wouldn’t have used such a
title myself were I in his position. I have the same concern with how
Paul Frijters and Cameron Murray frame their book ‘Game
of Mates: How Favours Bleed the Nation’...it
sounds antagonistic and off-putting, but that doesn't invalidate their arguments).
But as he says himself in the introduction of the book, environmentalism can’t be reduced to a simple dichotomy of rich and poor…
Note: the asterisk's are my own comments and references, shown below the quotes from the book.
But as he says himself in the introduction of the book, environmentalism can’t be reduced to a simple dichotomy of rich and poor…
Note: the asterisk's are my own comments and references, shown below the quotes from the book.
Environmentalism: Diverse, Fluid & Dynamic
“The
defining feature of environmentalism of
the rich is not the degree of affluence of the activists. It’s much
more about the loss of a ‘spirit of outrage’* at the underlying
structures of exploitation, inequality, and over-consumption that are
causing the global sustainability crisis,** and by a spirit of
compromise with solutions those at the World Economic Forum in Davos
can live with, perhaps even give a standing ovation.

Nor
in any way am I suggesting that all poor people or
organisations in poor countries are opposing environmentalism of the
rich. The ideas, values, and campaigns of environmentalism are too
diverse – and the interactions across groups too fluid and dynamic
– to capture in a simple dichotomy of rich and poor...”
“...the
beliefs and actions of an individual or organisation [will not]
always fit neatly into the category of environmentalism of the rich.
The views and lifestyles of individual environmentalists naturally
change over the years. So do the strategies and tactics of activist
organisations. A few organisations have stayed on a strong course of
resistance against the world order, such as the Sea Shepherd
Conservation Society, the Earth Liberation Front, and the Animal
Liberation Front. But far more have been evolving – sometimes under
new names, new leadership, and new offshoots – toward more
moderate, cooperative organisations.
Over
time the local chapters of international NGOs can end up all over the
map of environmentalism. WWF,
also known as the World Wildlife Fund and the World Wide Fund for
Nature, is one of the more prominent NGOs advancing environmentalism
of the rich, not only under it’s own brand, but also by partnering
with industry to launch certification bodies, such as the Forest
Stewardship Council and the Marine Stewardship Council.
Yet
even here there’s considerable variation across its scores of
offices around the world, with the US branch of WWF taking a
particularly strong pro-market and pro-business stance. On the other
hand the network of organisations under the umbrella of Friends of
the Earth is more critical of environmentalism of the rich – and
Friends of the Earth International has opposed free trade deals and
called for stricter regulation of multinational corporations – but,
again, there’s considerable diversity across branches, with shifts
over time.”
~Peter Dauvergne, Environmentalism of the Rich
~Peter Dauvergne, Environmentalism of the Rich
*Some
actively mock ‘outrage culture,’ and have a tendency of Rights Scolding (see my previous post
Rights Scolding) those
who show such outrage.
**Keith
Payne, in his book ‘The Broken Ladder’
points out how inequality increases status competition, which in turn
increases consumption in an attempt to “keep up with the Joneses”.
Richard Wilkinson and Kate
Pickett make similar observations in their book ‘The
Inner Level’.
You can find some quotes from Keith Payne's 'The Broken Ladder' here:
https://nathaniel-opinion.blogspot.com/2020/02/inequality-makes-everyone-act-strange.html
And from Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett's book here:
https://nathaniel-opinion.blogspot.com/2020/02/inequality-meritocracy-and-status.html
You can find some quotes from Keith Payne's 'The Broken Ladder' here:
https://nathaniel-opinion.blogspot.com/2020/02/inequality-makes-everyone-act-strange.html
And from Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett's book here:
https://nathaniel-opinion.blogspot.com/2020/02/inequality-meritocracy-and-status.html
https://nathaniel-opinion.blogspot.com/2019/12/absolute-poverty-vs-relative-deprivation.html
No comments:
Post a Comment